{{industry_name}}
Industry
Example: Example: Online food delivery platforms
Name the industry being analyzed.
Assess industry structure, competitive intensity, bargaining power, substitution, entry barriers, and long-term profit-pool durability.
This prompt has variables that can be replaced with your own information. Copy and use it with your preferred LLM, or try it out in the LearnerBox Prompt Playground.
Act as a senior investment research analyst specializing in industry structure and competitive economics.
Conduct a Porter’s Five Forces analysis using the information provided below.
Industry:
{{industry_name}}
Geographic and product scope:
{{scope}}
Industry participants and value chain:
{{participants_value_chain}}
Market structure and financial data:
{{market_financial_data}}
Customer, supplier, technology, and regulatory information:
{{supporting_information}}
Analysis requirements:
1. Define the industry boundaries precisely.
2. Map the value chain and major profit pools.
3. Assess rivalry among existing competitors using:
- concentration;
- growth;
- differentiation;
- excess capacity;
- fixed costs;
- switching costs;
- price competition;
- exit barriers; and
- strategic behavior.
4. Assess threat of new entrants using:
- capital requirements;
- scale;
- network effects;
- regulation;
- distribution;
- brand;
- technology;
- intellectual property;
- customer acquisition; and
- incumbent response.
5. Assess supplier power using:
- concentration;
- uniqueness;
- switching cost;
- forward integration;
- input criticality;
- capacity;
- labor;
- data;
- platforms; and
- regulation.
6. Assess buyer power using:
- concentration;
- price sensitivity;
- information;
- switching costs;
- backward integration;
- procurement sophistication;
- commoditization; and
- channel power.
7. Assess substitutes using:
- functional alternatives;
- relative price-performance;
- customer behavior;
- technology;
- regulation;
- convenience; and
- switching barriers.
8. Score each force using a transparent scale and supplied evidence.
9. Explain how the forces affect:
- revenue growth;
- pricing power;
- gross margin;
- operating margin;
- capital intensity;
- returns on capital;
- cash conversion; and
- cyclicality.
10. Identify how industry structure may change over three to five years.
11. Distinguish structural changes from cyclical conditions.
12. Identify which companies or business models are advantaged or disadvantaged.
13. Do not invent market shares, competitor behavior, regulation, margins, or technology adoption.
14. Clearly state evidence gaps and alternative interpretations.
Present the result as:
{{output_format}}
Include:
- industry definition;
- value-chain map;
- five-forces scorecard;
- force-by-force analysis;
- financial implications;
- structural versus cyclical factors;
- future-change scenarios;
- advantaged and disadvantaged models;
- key evidence gaps;
- investment implications; and
- monitoring indicators.
Replace each variable shown in double curly brackets with accurate information from your own professional context.
{{industry_name}}
Example: Example: Online food delivery platforms
Name the industry being analyzed.
{{scope}}
Example: Define countries, customer segments, products, channels, and exclusions.
Five Forces results depend heavily on industry boundaries.
{{participants_value_chain}}
Example: List competitors, suppliers, customers, distributors, platforms, regulators, and substitutes.
Include upstream and downstream participants.
{{market_financial_data}}
Example: Provide concentration, growth, market shares, margins, capital intensity, capacity, and returns.
Use sourced and current industry data.
{{supporting_information}}
Example: Provide switching costs, contracts, technologies, regulations, channels, and behavior.
Qualitative evidence supports interpretation of each force.
{{output_format}}
Choose the format required for research or investment review.
A structured Five Forces analysis containing industry boundaries, value chain, force scores, financial implications, structural and cyclical factors, future scenarios, business-model advantages, and monitoring indicators.
These characteristics describe the type of thinking, customization, and output structure involved in using this prompt effectively.
This breakdown explains how the prompt’s major components work together to guide the AI toward a useful, reliable, and well-structured response.
Positions the AI as an investment-research specialist in industry structure.
Defines industry scope, value chain, participants, financial data, and supporting evidence.
Requires a Five Forces assessment linked to profit-pool durability and financial outcomes.
Prevents invented shares, margins, regulation, technology adoption, and competitor behavior.
Requires scorecards, financial implications, scenarios, advantages, gaps, and indicators.
Industry, scope, participants, market data, supporting information, and output format.
AI-generated responses can contain errors, omissions, unsupported assumptions, outdated information, or recommendations that do not reflect your jurisdiction or professional context.
Verify calculations, evidence, regulations, standards, policies, and professional recommendations before relying on the result. The qualified professional remains responsible for the final decision.
Return to the specialization page to explore additional professional workflows and prompt templates.
Customize the template for your professional context or open it directly in the Prompt Playground for guided AI practice.