Conduct a comprehensive pre-submission quality audit of an academic manuscript by systematically evaluating scientific quality, reporting completeness, structural consistency, methodological rigour, writing quality, publication readiness, and research integrity.
This prompt has variables that can be replaced with your own information. Copy and use it with your preferred LLM, or try it out in the LearnerBox Prompt Playground.
Act as an experienced Research Quality Assurance Consultant, Senior Journal Editor, and Academic Publication Auditor.
Conduct a comprehensive quality audit of the manuscript using only the verified information provided below.
Manuscript:
{{manuscript}}
Target journal requirements:
{{journal_requirements}}
Audit priorities:
{{audit_priorities}}
Audit requirements:
1. Begin by assessing the manuscript's overall readiness for journal submission, considering originality, scientific contribution, completeness, and alignment with the intended journal.
2. Perform a systematic audit of every major manuscript component, including the title, abstract, keywords, introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, references, tables, figures, supplementary materials, declarations, acknowledgements, funding statements, and data availability statements where applicable.
3. Evaluate whether the manuscript demonstrates internal consistency across its research objectives, hypotheses or research questions, methodology, analyses, results, discussion, and conclusions. Identify contradictions, omissions, unsupported transitions, or logical gaps.
4. Assess the quality of reporting by examining methodological transparency, completeness of evidence, clarity of data presentation, reproducibility, citation consistency, terminology, figure and table integration, and adherence to recognised reporting standards where applicable.
5. Review the manuscript's writing quality, organisation, academic style, readability, paragraph structure, heading hierarchy, grammar, and consistency of terminology without rewriting the manuscript.
6. Identify critical deficiencies that should be corrected before journal submission, distinguishing between issues that affect scientific validity, publication readiness, editorial presentation, and general readability.
7. Prioritise all identified issues according to their likely impact on peer review, classifying them as Critical, High, Moderate, or Minor priority.
8. Recommend practical actions that would improve the manuscript's quality, clarity, scientific credibility, and publication readiness while preserving the authors' intended contribution.
Research integrity requirements:
- Never invent errors, deficiencies, or inconsistencies that are unsupported by the manuscript.
- Clearly distinguish verified observations from professional recommendations.
- Do not fabricate missing references, statistical analyses, data, or methodological details.
- Avoid rewriting the manuscript unless explicitly requested.
- Base every recommendation on recognised scholarly publishing standards and transparent quality assurance principles.
- Recognise strengths as well as areas requiring improvement.
Present the final output with:
- executive quality assessment;
- publication readiness scorecard;
- section-by-section audit;
- critical findings;
- prioritised improvement plan;
- research integrity observations;
- submission readiness assessment;
- final quality assurance summary.Replace each variable shown in double curly brackets with accurate information from your own professional context.
{{manuscript}}
Example: Provide the complete manuscript or the sections to be audited.
The more complete the manuscript, the more comprehensive the quality audit.
{{journal_requirements}}
Example: Provide the journal guidelines, reporting standards, formatting rules, author instructions, or editorial requirements.
Including journal requirements allows the audit to evaluate compliance with publication expectations.
{{audit_priorities}}
Example: For example: publication readiness, reporting quality, methodological consistency, writing quality, references, statistical reporting, or complete manuscript audit.
Specify any areas that should receive particular attention during the audit.
A structured manuscript quality audit containing an executive assessment, publication readiness scorecard, section-by-section audit, prioritised findings, quality improvement recommendations, research integrity observations, and an overall submission readiness assessment.
These characteristics describe the type of thinking, customization, and output structure involved in using this prompt effectively.
This breakdown explains how the prompt’s major components work together to guide the AI toward a useful, reliable, and well-structured response.
Positions the AI as a Research Quality Assurance Consultant, Senior Journal Editor, and Academic Publication Auditor.
Defines the manuscript, journal requirements, reporting standards, and quality audit priorities.
Conducts a systematic pre-submission quality audit that evaluates scientific quality, reporting completeness, methodological consistency, writing quality, and publication readiness.
Prevents fabricated deficiencies, unsupported criticism, manuscript rewriting, or invented evidence while requiring objective and evidence-based quality assessment.
Requires an executive assessment, publication readiness scorecard, section-by-section audit, prioritised findings, research integrity observations, submission readiness assessment, and final quality summary.
Academic manuscript, journal requirements, and audit priorities.
AI-generated responses can contain errors, omissions, unsupported assumptions, outdated information, or recommendations that do not reflect your jurisdiction or professional context.
Verify calculations, evidence, regulations, standards, policies, and professional recommendations before relying on the result. The qualified professional remains responsible for the final decision.
Return to the specialization page to explore additional professional workflows and prompt templates.
Customize the template for your professional context or open it directly in the Prompt Playground for guided AI practice.