Audit a commercial shell for usable-area efficiency, planning modules, tenant subdivision, circulation, services, accessibility, egress, façade coordination, and future adaptability.
This prompt has variables that can be replaced with your own information. Copy and use it with your preferred LLM, or try it out in the LearnerBox Prompt Playground.
Act as an experienced commercial interior designer specializing in commercial core-and-shell space planning and circulation efficiency audit.
Develop a professional preliminary strategy using the information below.
Core-and-Shell Geometry and Base-Building Information:
{{shell_geometry}}
Target Occupancy, Uses, and Tenancy Model:
{{occupancy_program}}
Structural Grid, Façade, Risers, and MEP Systems:
{{structure_services}}
Entrances, Cores, Vertical Transport, and Existing Routes:
{{circulation}}
Measurement, Accessibility, Fire, and Lease Criteria:
{{standards}}
Budget, Landlord, Phasing, and Existing-Condition Constraints:
{{constraints}}
Planning requirements:
1. Separate gross, rentable, usable, common, service, and circulation areas using the supplied measurement basis.
2. Map core, columns, façade modules, entries, vertical transport, risers, toilets, plant, and service access.
3. Develop at least three tenancy and planning configurations.
4. Compare efficiency, natural light, flexibility, circulation, privacy, services, accessibility, egress, and leasing implications.
5. Review partition alignment with structural and façade modules.
6. Identify high-loss zones, inaccessible corners, dead ends, oversized circulation, and service conflicts.
7. Create a consultant coordination and due-diligence checklist.
8. Do not invent dimensions, occupancy, codes, product performance, test results, budgets, lease obligations, structural capacity, or user data that were not supplied. Distinguish verified information, assumptions, recommendations, and unresolved items. Do not certify accessibility, fire safety, egress, acoustics, structural adequacy, electrical, mechanical, security, environmental, or building-code compliance. Flag all matters requiring review by licensed architects, interior designers, engineers, accessibility specialists, acousticians, contractors, manufacturers, facilities teams, security consultants, or local authorities.
Present the result as:
{{output_format}}
Include:
- project objectives and confirmed assumptions;
- existing-condition and user summary;
- design or planning strategy;
- option comparison where appropriate;
- technical, spatial, performance, or material matrix;
- consultant and contractor coordination requirements;
- quick wins and long-term actions;
- risks, exclusions, and unresolved information;
- implementation priorities; and
- professional validation checklist.Replace each variable shown in double curly brackets with accurate information from your own professional context.
{{shell_geometry}}
Example: Provide detailed, verified information for this project input.
Provide verified information for core-and-shell geometry and base-building information.
{{occupancy_program}}
Example: Describe current conditions, priorities, users, and known limitations.
Provide verified information for target occupancy, uses, and tenancy model.
{{structure_services}}
Example: Include dimensions, quantities, systems, or performance criteria where available.
Provide verified information for structural grid, façade, risers, and mep systems.
{{circulation}}
Example: Identify fixed elements, dependencies, and operational realities.
Provide verified information for entrances, cores, vertical transport, and existing routes.
{{standards}}
Example: Provide approved preferences, standards, or evidence where available.
Provide verified information for measurement, accessibility, fire, and lease criteria.
{{constraints}}
Example: Describe budget, schedule, approvals, phasing, maintenance, and procurement constraints.
Provide verified information for budget, landlord, phasing, and existing-condition constraints.
{{output_format}}
Choose the professional deliverable format.
A professional commercial core-and-shell space planning and circulation efficiency audit deliverable containing verified assumptions, design logic, comparative analysis, matrices, coordination requirements, risks, implementation priorities, and validation needs.
These characteristics describe the type of thinking, customization, and output structure involved in using this prompt effectively.
This breakdown explains how the prompt’s major components work together to guide the AI toward a useful, reliable, and well-structured response.
Positions the AI as a commercial interior design specialist for the selected workflow.
Defines the site, users, systems, performance requirements, and project constraints.
Requires a professional strategy with options, matrices, coordination, risks, and implementation priorities.
Prevents invented dimensions, product claims, standards, and compliance certification.
Requires objectives, analysis, matrices, recommendations, risks, implementation, and validation.
Core-and-Shell Geometry and Base-Building Information, Target Occupancy, Uses, and Tenancy Model, Structural Grid, Façade, Risers, and MEP Systems, Entrances, Cores, Vertical Transport, and Existing Routes, Measurement, Accessibility, Fire, and Lease Criteria, Budget, Landlord, Phasing, and Existing-Condition Constraints, and output format.
AI-generated responses can contain errors, omissions, unsupported assumptions, outdated information, or recommendations that do not reflect your jurisdiction or professional context.
Verify calculations, evidence, regulations, standards, policies, and professional recommendations before relying on the result. The qualified professional remains responsible for the final decision.
Return to the specialization page to explore additional professional workflows and prompt templates.
Customize the template for your professional context or open it directly in the Prompt Playground for guided AI practice.