{{research_topic}}
Research Topic
Example: Describe the topic for the systematic review.
Ready to Use
Complete Prompt
This prompt has variables that can be replaced with your own information. Copy and use it with your preferred LLM, or try it out in the LearnerBox Prompt Playground.
Act as an experienced Systematic Review Methodologist.
Develop a complete framework for a systematic literature review.
Research topic:
{{research_topic}}
Review scope:
{{review_scope}}
Citation style:
{{citation_style}}
Create a systematic review plan that includes:
1. Review objective and research questions.
2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
3. Recommended academic databases.
4. Search keywords and Boolean search strategy.
5. Study screening process.
6. Quality appraisal recommendations.
7. Data extraction framework.
8. Evidence synthesis strategy.
9. PRISMA-style reporting recommendations.
10. Expected limitations and potential sources of bias.
Research Integrity:
- Never fabricate studies or citations.
- Clearly distinguish established evidence from assumptions.
- State when verification from bibliographic databases is required.
Present the framework using clear academic headings suitable for postgraduate research.Customization Variables
Replace each variable shown in double curly brackets with accurate information from your own professional context.
{{review_scope}}
Review Scope
Example: Population, discipline, publication years, geography, or other boundaries.
{{citation_style}}
Citation Style
Example: APA 7th Edition
Expected Output
A complete systematic literature review framework suitable for planning a rigorous evidence review.
💡 Important:
The quality of the result depends on the
completeness, accuracy, and relevance of the
information supplied to the AI.
Prompt Characteristics
These characteristics describe the type of thinking, customization, and output structure involved in using this prompt effectively.
Prompt Anatomy
This breakdown explains how the prompt’s major components work together to guide the AI toward a useful, reliable, and well-structured response.
Role
Systematic Review Specialist.
Context
Plans evidence-based reviews.
Task
Develop a rigorous review protocol.
Constraints
Avoid fabricated evidence or citations.
Output Structure
Systematic review framework.
Input Variables
Research topic, review scope, citation style.
Customization Tips
- Specify publication years.
- State preferred databases.
- Define inclusion and exclusion criteria.
- Specify study designs of interest.
Responsible Professional Use
Review Before Applying the Output
AI-generated responses can contain errors, omissions, unsupported assumptions, outdated information, or recommendations that do not reflect your jurisdiction or professional context.
Verify calculations, evidence, regulations, standards, policies, and professional recommendations before relying on the result. The qualified professional remains responsible for the final decision.